Bill, that is. Every now and then, even lately, his mental and verbal acuity remind me why I used to be a supporter. A South Carolina reporter throws, and the former president swings:
"Dick Harpootlian has called some of the tactics used in the campaign reprehensible and reminiscent of Lee Atwater to try to appeal on the basis of race and gender and for suppressing the vote in Nevada," a reporter asked.
(Clinton's response)
"You asked me about this. You sat through this whole meeting. Not one, single solitary soul asked me about this. And they never do," he said.
"They're feeding you this because they know this is what you want. This is what you live for. This hurts the people of South Carolina, because the people of South Carolina … ask questions about what they care about," he said. "And what they care about is not gonna be in the news coverage tonight, because you don't care about it. What you care about is this."
He's right, of course. It's like those hour-and-a-half long State of the Union speeches Clinton gave during his presidency, where he would tirelessly tick off an unbelievable range of policy minutiae for the duration. At the close, the press would always pronounce them a dud, a flop, a bore, blah blah, even though polls of the viewers at home showed that they actually really liked not only his ideas, but his effort in explaining them in such great detail.
I don't think it's presumptuous to assume that memories of how reporters treated those speeches then are fueling a great deal of his anger at the press today.
Oh, and of course Monica. I'm sure that still makes him hate their guts, too.