TODAY'S LIES


Because the truth is...relative.

New York Post Endorses Obama

Print the article

This entry was posted on 1/30/2008 11:29 PM and is filed under 2008 Election, All Posts.


From the "Thanks, But No Thanks Department".  Some "endorsement":

For all his charisma and his eloquence, the rookie senator sorely lacks seasoning: Regarding national security, his worldview is beyond naive; America must defend itself against those sworn to destroy the nation.
His all-things-to-all-people approach to complicated domestic issues also arouses scant confidence.  "Change!" for the sake of change does not a credible campaign platform make.  But he remains a highly intelligent man, with a strong record as a conciliator.
And, again, he is not Team Clinton.
That counts for a very great deal.


Take it away, Rupert Murdoch!

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

    • 1/31/2008 5:11 PM Suki wrote:
      I don't understand why papers endorse for both a Democratic and Republican candidate.  Then they get to endorse one candidate from the general election too.  If you are a conservative paper, why not just make your case for the favored Republican?  I mean, they're not fooling anybody with an Obama endorsement.
      Reply to this
      1. 1/31/2008 5:31 PM znufrii wrote:
        Because the media is supposed to be at least nominally unbiased.  Plus it gives them another chance for the Clinton-bashing they love so much.
        Reply to this
    Leave a comment

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.